Wolfowitz
for Africa
In
The Washington Spark [June 2005]
Liberal advocacy groups came out forcefully
against President Bush's recent surprise nomination of Paul Wolfowitz
as president of the World Bank. Many fear that Mr. Wolfowitz will
pursue a policy tainted with U.S. economic and strategic interests,
shifting the Bank's -already contentious- focus away from its' stated
goal to "fight poverty and improve the living standards of
people in the developing world".
With Wolfowitz explicitly laying claim to
a policy of "poverty reduction with special focus on Africa",
the Spark set out to uncover African
perspectives on the new president of the World Bank.
Behind the World Bank
Amidst the settling dust, the World Bank
rose from the still smoking remains of World War II as part of the
Bretton Woods Agreement. In much the same breath, the International
Monetary Fund (IMF) and the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade
(GATT, now the World Trade Organization or WTO) made their appearance
in the global arena.
Despite claims to the contrary, the World
Bank runs much like a private corporation. Member countries adopt
the effective roles of shareholders, with the number of shares -and
votes- based roughly on the size of the country's economy. Consequently,
the U.S. is by far the largest single shareholder, with 16.41 percent
of votes, followed by Japan (7.87 percent), Germany (4.49 percent),
Britain (4.31 percent), and France (4.31 percent).
As a result of this voting structure, the
Bank's president is traditionally a national of the U.S. Elected
for a five-year renewable term, the president chairs meetings of
the Board of Directors and is responsible for overall management
of the Bank.
Historically, the U.S. Treasury Department, which monitors the Bank's
daily operations and instructs the U.S. executive director how to
vote on loans and other issues, was responsible for who occupied
the Bank's driving seat. However, as pointed out by Professor Victor
LeVine, a political scientist at the Washington University in St.
Louis, Wolfowitz's nomination was unique in having been imposed
by the White House, whilst "the U.S. Treasury was relegated
to the cheering section".
Wolfowitz's Background
A worried Chofamba Sithole, an outspoken
Zimbabwean journalist, told the Spark how Wolfowitz's background
is unmistakably interwoven with U.S. national defense and security.
Back in March 2001, Wolfowitz began his third tour at the Defense
Department as the 28th Deputy Secretary of Defense. With over thirty
years of public service under his belt, mostly in government service
under six different Presidents, there were few who doubted his suitability
for the post in the Pentagon or White House.
Since September 11th, Wolfowitz has been
instrumental in planning the so-called 'war on terrorism', including
military operations in Afghanistan and Iraq. He has also played
an active role in diplomacy, through a plethora of speeches before
international audiences.
During his first Pentagon tour as Deputy
Assistant Secretary of Defense for Regional Programs from 1977-1980,
Wolfowitz led the first major assessment of U.S. strategic interests
in the Persian Gulf, a study which spawned the so- called 'United
States Central Command'.
Wolfowitz also initiated the 'Maritime Pre-positioning
Program', a plan that positioned heavy weapons and ammunition aboard
ships in the Persian Gulf region. This plan would form the backbone
of the initial U.S. response during Operation Desert Shield 12 years
later. Indeed, it was none other than Wolfowitz who succeeded in
razing over $50 billion in allied financial support for the Gulf
War.
Says Chofamba, "He has in mind precisely
the radical reform of the key institutions of global governance
to comply with the imperatives of America's new grand strategy for
the post-Cold War world - democratic globalism, otherwise known
as neoconservatism."
So what do Africans think?
He has in mind precisely the radical reform
of the key institutions of global governance to comply with the
imperatives of America's new grand strategy for the post-Cold War
world - democratic globalism, otherwise known as neoconservatism.
- Chofamba Sithole
Understandably, many Africans are worried
about Wolfowitz' undisputable ties with the military-industrial
complex. Emira Woods, a fellow at the left-leaning Institute for
Policy Studies, said "It's a slap in the face, it's a poke
in the eye. It's bad for the international community in general,
and particularly for people already pushed to the brink in poor
and marginalised communities," reported South Africa's Mail
& Guardian in an article entitled: "Wolfowitz: the velocirapter".
Mrs. Woods added that "
the person who was the architect
of the corporate-driven plan for Iraq that failed now gets a chance
to do that in the rest of the world."
Many have also questioned Wolfowitz' credentials,
pointing out that he has no experience in banking or finance, and
has never worked, studied or written in the field of international
development.
Prof. LeVine labels much of the liberal reaction
as "reflexive", preferring instead to take a cautionary
stance and defer judgement. He, too, was surprised at the nomination,
but draws attention to Wolfowitz' experience as ambassador to Indonesia.
"Although we aught to be skeptical", he told the Spark,
"Wolfowitz may well turn out to be the chameleon I think he
is."
|